Home›Case Studies
Real Accounts · Anonymous · Verified Results

What C&I accounts actually save
when strategy replaces order-taking.

These are real accounts across PJM and ISO-NE markets. Names and identifying details are withheld by client request. Supply savings, capacity reductions, and demand response revenue are independently verifiable through utility bills and settlement statements.

$2.1M+Total documented savings across active accounts
30+Investment-grade suppliers in competitive bid process
4.9/5Average client satisfaction rating
Filter by:
🏭 Industrial Manufacturing
PJM · Pennsylvania
$182,400/year
Total Annual Savings

Automotive parts manufacturer eliminates $140K in hidden capacity costs and enrolls in PJM ELRP

A PECO-territory manufacturer with 4.2 MW peak demand had been on a fixed-rate supply contract for three years. Their broker had never conducted a PLC tag analysis or discussed capacity cost exposure. After the 2024 BRA cleared at $270/MW-day, they were facing a $147,000 annual capacity cost increase with no mitigation strategy in place.

The Challenge

Their existing fixed contract included an uncapped capacity pass-through clause — meaning the 800% BRA price increase passed directly to their bill starting June 2025. Additionally, their PLC tag had grown 22% over three years due to poor load management during summer peak hours. No one had told them.

Our Strategy
  • Conducted a full 15-minute interval data analysis to identify peak exposure windows
  • Implemented a proactive 5CP curtailment protocol targeting August peak hours
  • Renegotiated supply contract with capacity cost cap and cleaner pass-through language
  • Enrolled 800 kW of interruptible load in PJM ELRP for capacity payment revenue
−31%
PLC tag reduction
$41,200
Annual ELRP revenue
$87,500
Supply contract savings
0
Curtailment events impacting production
"Their ICAP tag analysis alone was worth more than every conversation we'd had with our previous broker combined. We had no idea we were leaving this much money on the table."— Operations VP, Automotive Parts Manufacturer, Pennsylvania
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 14 months
🏢 Commercial Real Estate
PJM · New Jersey
$64,800/year
Total Annual Savings

Six-building office portfolio cuts blended rate 2.3¢/kWh and generates $47K in demand response revenue

A PSE&G-territory commercial property group managing 380,000 sq ft across six office buildings had negotiated their own supply contracts directly with a single supplier. They were paying 11.4¢/kWh on a 12-month fixed contract with no capacity optimization and no demand response enrollment.

The Challenge

The portfolio's peak load occurred during predictable business hours, making it an ideal demand response candidate — but no one had modeled the portfolio as a combined asset. Individual building contracts were expiring at different times, making coordinated strategy difficult without a dedicated energy manager.

Our Strategy
  • Synchronized all six contract renewal dates into a single portfolio bid event
  • Ran a 30-supplier competitive bid, normalizing all offers on a fully-loaded basis
  • Structured a 24-month fixed contract at 9.1¢/kWh across the portfolio
  • Enrolled two highest-load buildings in PJM ELRP with combined 350 kW commitment
2.3¢
Rate reduction per kWh
$47,000
Annual ELRP revenue
$17,800
Supply savings vs. renewal
24 mo.
Contract term with price certainty
"We enrolled in PJM ELRP and generated $47,000 in curtailment revenue we didn't know existed. That's found money that goes directly to our investors."— Director of Facilities, Commercial Property Group, New Jersey
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 6 months
🏥 Healthcare System
ISO-NE · Connecticut
$93,400/year
Total Annual Savings

Regional hospital system uses Block & Index to hedge winter risk and enrolls in ISO-NE FCM

A three-facility Eversource-territory health system with combined 6.8 MW demand had just auto-renewed a full fixed-rate contract at an above-market rate. Their CFO was concerned about ISO-NE winter reliability risk following two consecutive winters with severe price spikes but had no framework for evaluating procurement alternatives.

The Challenge

Hospitals cannot curtail load during emergencies, which complicated demand response eligibility. The existing full-fixed contract included above-market capacity adders and provided no transparency on forward cost exposure. ISO-NE's Forward Capacity Market had gone largely unexamined by their previous broker.

Our Strategy
  • Identified a material change clause allowing early exit from the existing contract
  • Structured a Block & Index contract: 75% fixed base, 25% index for non-clinical load
  • Secured winter peak hedge to cap ISO-NE spike exposure through April
  • Enrolled non-critical auxiliary systems in ISO-NE FCM as a passive capacity resource
$28,100
Annual FCM capacity revenue
$65,300
Supply cost reduction
Capped
Winter spike exposure
0
Clinical operations impacted
"Block & Index was exactly right for our load profile. We fixed the base and floated the rest. Significant improvement versus the full-fixed contract we had been defaulting to."— CFO, Regional Health System, Connecticut
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 10 months
🏛 Municipal Government
PJM · Maryland
$78,200/year
Total Annual Savings

Maryland municipality reduces energy spend 19% and achieves full board-level reporting visibility

A Pepco-territory municipal government managing 14 public facilities — including a community center, public works complex, and administrative buildings — had procured energy through a state aggregation program for seven years. When the program contract expired, their finance team had no framework for evaluating competitive supply options.

The Challenge

Public entities face unique procurement constraints including solicitation requirements, council approval timelines, and budget cycle alignment. The municipality had never received a PLC tag analysis or demand response screening. Their existing reporting consisted of a monthly invoice with no variance analysis or forward exposure modeling.

Our Strategy
  • Mapped all 14 accounts by utility, load shape, and capacity tag exposure
  • Structured a competitive bid compliant with Maryland procurement requirements
  • Negotiated a 36-month fixed contract with transparency on all non-bypassable charges
  • Delivered monthly budget-to-actual reporting and quarterly forward exposure briefings
19%
Total energy cost reduction
$78,200
Annual savings vs. prior program
36 mo.
Budget certainty period
Monthly
Board-level variance reporting
"The reporting we receive is unlike anything we've seen from an energy consultant. Our board now has full visibility into energy spend for the first time. That transparency alone justified the relationship."— Director of Finance, Municipal Government, Maryland
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 8 months
🎓 Higher Education
ISO-NE · Massachusetts
$112,600/year
Total Annual Savings

University system generates $34K in passive FCM revenue and restructures four-building procurement strategy

A National Grid-territory university with four buildings — a main academic hall, dormitory complex, athletic facility, and administrative center — was procuring energy individually per building with no coordinated strategy. Contracts were different lengths, different structures, and demand response had never been evaluated.

The Challenge

The dormitory and athletic facility had highly variable load shapes driven by academic calendar cycles, making full-fixed contracts inefficient. The VP of Operations had been advocating for a consolidated energy strategy for two years but lacked the market data to build a business case for the board.

Our Strategy
  • Modeled 15-minute interval data across all four buildings to identify load shape profiles
  • Recommended Block & Index for the dormitory (65% fixed) to capture summer index savings
  • Structured full-fixed contracts for academic and administrative buildings
  • Enrolled athletic facility and dormitory in ISO-NE FCM as demand response resources
$34,000
Annual FCM capacity payments
$78,600
Supply procurement savings
0
Academic operations impacted
4
Buildings under coordinated strategy
"Jordan modeled our interval data across all four buildings and found that two were ideal for demand response. We now generate $34,000 annually and haven't had a single curtailment event affect operations."— VP of Operations, University System, Massachusetts
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 12 months
🏭 Food & Beverage
PJM · Ohio
$96,300/year
Total Annual Savings

Food manufacturer avoids $85K capacity cost surge with proactive PLC reduction and Index procurement

An AEP Ohio-territory food and beverage manufacturer with 3.1 MW peak demand had auto-renewed a full-fixed contract just before the 2024 BRA results were published. When the 800% capacity price increase was announced, their CFO contacted us to understand their exposure — and whether anything could be done mid-contract.

The Challenge

The manufacturer operated 24/7 with load that peaked during afternoon production runs — directly overlapping with PJM coincident peak hours. Their existing contract had uncapped capacity pass-throughs and they had no PLC curtailment protocol. The exposure from the new BRA pricing was estimated at $83,000 in additional annual charges.

Our Strategy
  • Conducted emergency PLC tag analysis and modeled curtailment scenarios by production line
  • Developed a 5CP alert protocol with 48-hour advance notice from PJM monitoring
  • Shifted three non-critical production processes to off-peak hours during peak season
  • Positioned the account for an Index contract at renewal to capture post-BRA price softening
−28%
PLC tag reduction achieved
$53,800
Capacity cost avoidance
$42,500
Index procurement savings
0
Production batches disrupted
"Most brokers send you a rate and disappear. The Energy Exchange Market sent us a 22-page capacity cost analysis before we signed anything. That level of transparency is rare in this industry."— Energy Manager, Food & Beverage Manufacturer, Ohio
Get a Similar Analysis →
Results achieved over 11 months

Your account is next.
Let's find what you're leaving on the table.

A comprehensive energy audit takes 48 hours. It costs nothing. And it will tell you exactly what your current strategy is missing — in writing, with real numbers.

Request a Comprehensive Energy Audit Call Jordan Directly: 610-904-9403